Sample record. Fictional demonstration content.
Abstract
We audit 2,400 checklist responses submitted over three years and compare them against the papers they accompany. Checks for compute reporting and variance were answered affirmatively in 78% of cases but supported by the paper in only 41%, suggesting that checklists work best when responses must point to a location in the text.
Keywords reproducibility · checklists · audit
Full text
CTM-PR-2026-0011.pdf
How to cite
Novak, I. & Medina, C. (2026). Reproducibility Checklists in Practice: A Three-Year Audit. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Open and Reproducible AI Research (OPENAIR 2026) (pp. 1–12). CONTINUUM Proceedings. doi:10.xxxx/ctm.pr.2026.0011