Reviewed by the event organisers
Permanent, citable homes for conference papers.
Open-access proceedings for conferences, workshops and symposia. Organisers deposit their accepted papers; every paper and every volume receives a DOI.
2 resultsSearch & filters ↓
We audit 2,400 checklist responses submitted over three years and compare them against the papers they accompany. Checks for compute reporting and variance were answered affirmatively in 78% of cases but supported by the paper in only 41%, suggesting that checklists work best when responses must point to a location in the text.
We study reports from 300 openly reviewed machine-learning papers. Open reports are longer, more specific and more often cite evidence than comparable anonymous reports from closed venues, and reviewers who sign their reports are no more lenient. We discuss limits of the comparison.
